RADAR TULUNGAGUNG –Â Anwar Usman final session at the Constitutional Court became a major public highlight after the senior judge delivered an emotional apology before reading what could be his last ruling in office. The moment happened during a formal hearing when Anwar Usman spoke directly to the courtroom and acknowledged that his constitutional service would soon come to an end.
The statement immediately attracted attention because Anwar Usman final session marked the closing stage of a long judicial career that lasted 15 years inside one of Indonesia’s most important legal institutions.
Before continuing with the court agenda, Anwar Usman explained that his term would officially end on April 6, 2026. He then apologized for any actions, words, or decisions that may have disappointed others during his years as a constitutional judge.
Apology Delivered Before Reading Court Decision
During the hearing, Anwar Usman paused before reading the legal decision and addressed everyone present in the courtroom.
He said that the session might become the last hearing he would personally attend because his period of service at the Constitutional Court of Indonesia had nearly reached its legal limit.
He also acknowledged that a long period of public service naturally included moments that may not have satisfied every party.
Because of that, he offered what he described as a sincere apology from the deepest part of his heart.
The statement created a solemn atmosphere inside the courtroom because it came unexpectedly before the judicial reading began.
Fifteen Years of Service Near Official Completion
Anwar Usman first joined the Constitutional Court in 2011 and later became one of the institution’s central figures.
His term now reaches its official conclusion after exactly fifteen years of constitutional duty.
Under current legal provisions, his service ends in early April 2026.
Besides completing the full term, he will also approach the age limit applied to constitutional judges later this year.
That combination makes his departure part of a scheduled institutional transition rather than an abrupt change.
Public Attention Returns to His Judicial Legacy
The farewell statement also reopened public discussion about the broader legacy of his judicial career.
Many people continue to connect his name with major constitutional debates that shaped national politics over recent years.
His role became especially prominent because of his family connection to Joko Widodo, whose government period often intersected with major constitutional cases.
That relationship placed Anwar Usman under strong public scrutiny whenever the court handled politically sensitive matters.
Ethics Case Remains Part of Public Memory
Although his final statement focused only on apology and retirement, public memory still strongly links him to the ethics controversy that changed his leadership position inside the court.
The court’s ethics council previously ruled that he committed a serious ethical violation involving conflict of interest.
That decision removed him from the position of chief justice but allowed him to continue serving as a constitutional judge until the end of his term.
The ruling later became one of the most discussed institutional ethics cases in Indonesia.
Farewell Carries Strong Symbolic Meaning
Legal observers see the apology as more than a formal farewell.
For many, the statement reflects a symbolic closing chapter after years of legal and political attention.
Although Anwar Usman did not mention specific controversies, his words immediately reminded the public of important moments during his tenure.
His tone remained calm and formal throughout the short statement, consistent with courtroom procedure.
Constitutional Court Enters New Transition
As April approaches, the Constitutional Court now prepares for another leadership adjustment.
Senior judges who leave after long service usually affect institutional rhythm because experience often shapes courtroom dynamics.
The court will continue handling major constitutional cases, but Anwar Usman final session already signals a visible generational shift inside the institution.
For now, the farewell hearing closes an important period in Indonesia’s constitutional history.
Final Words Mark Closing Chapter
Anwar Usman ended his brief statement without extending political remarks or additional commentary.
He returned directly to the court agenda after offering the apology.
That simple sequence made the moment even more noticeable because it blended personal reflection with constitutional duty.
His final months now move toward retirement under continued public attention.

